Skip to content

Countdown to Declassification: Finding Answers to the Able Archer 83 Nuclear War Scare

November 4, 2013
Test of a BGM-109G Gryphon ground-launched cruise missile, deployed to Europe in November 1983.

Test of a BGM-109G Gryphon ground-launched cruise missile, deployed to Europe in November 1983.

Recently, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists published a piece I wrote in which I attempted to convey the link between the danger of the 1983 Able Archer nuclear war scare (read the 1,000-plus page set of annotated documents here), and how the “US classification system creates crippling and utterly unnecessary obstacles to a clearer public understanding of historical events, including the potential danger of nuclear miscalculation that occurred during Able Archer 83.”

I conclude:

The withholding of information about close brushes with nuclear war is more difficult to justify in the United States, ostensibly a representative democracy then fighting a Cold War against totalitarian communism to preserve its citizens’ democratic way of life, relative freedom, and open society. Were these values expressed when events suggesting that there had been a real risk of accidental nuclear war were concealed from the public through the classification system?

Indeed, immediately after the first Special National Intelligence Estimate on Able Archer 83 was produced, the US government sanitized all mention of the possibility that the Soviets viewed it as a possible first strike vehicle from reports to its NATO allies. Part of the reason for this sanitization was to protect the MI6 source inside the KGB, Gordievsky. But clearly, some US policy makers also did not want to tell their NATO allies that Able Archer 83 may have increased the risk of nuclear war, because doing so might have caused some of those allies to reconsider decisions to deploy nuclear-armed US cruise and Pershing II missiles on their territory.

In the early 1980s, the decision to conceal the risks created by Able Archer 83 may have seemed necessary to US national security. One can at least understand the belief that the forward-basing of US nuclear missiles was amore important concern than abstract notions of open government. The continued classification of significant documents related to Able Archer 83, 30 years after the fact, is much harder to defend. Documents that deal with this exercise –including the most comprehensive report ever written about it– contain information of interest not only to scholars of the Cold War, but also to all concerned about the danger of nuclear weapons. If, as some within the US intelligence community have claimed, there was an increased danger of nuclear war through miscalculation in 1983, the documents detailing the danger of Able Archer 83 could help avert current and future nuclear standoffs and reduce the probability of accidental war. Furthermore, revelations about the risk and possibility
of nuclear miscalculation complicate the argument that nuclear deterrence has gifted humanity with a “long peace” and undermine the contention that the danger of worldwide nuclear war ended with the 1962 Cuban missile crisis.

Now, the Soviet SS-20s and American Pershing IIs have been removed and retired, the Cold War has ended, and the Soviet Union no longer exists. After the fact, a fuller picture of the dangers of Able Archer 83 has emerged. But due to failures of the US declassification system, honest and malicious, the most important documents about this potentially dangerous nuclear episode remain unavailable to the public, locked in secure facilities, under the rubric that their release “reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security,” when, in fact, their declassification could help protect the United States and the rest of the world from the gravest of all security threats: nuclear war.

The full article is published by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. Fran Macadam permalink
    November 2, 2013 8:34 am

    This problem has only metastisized, but now in the West, as the Snowden revelations underline:

    “…in the early 1980s, Andropov and Reagan relied upon classified information
    unavailable to their citizens. This poses a tricky question about the
    public’s right to know about the danger posed by events
    like Able Archer 83, both at the time and afterward. This
    question was probably easier for the Soviet Union to answer
    or avoid altogether during the early 1980s; the state security organs were
    responsible for the protection of the motherland and, by design, required
    and brooked no public oversight. Of course, this is not to say that Moscow’s
    security apparatus operated well.”

    Money quote: “the state security organs … by design, required
    and brooked no public oversight.”

    Gen. Alexander and Clapper unaccountable to democratic oversight, at the helm on the bridge of their Star Chamber ship.

  2. November 2, 2013 1:45 pm

    I recommend the books by Rainer Rupp who was present during Able Archer at the 83 NATO-Headquarters in Brussels. For some days he even took the chair. Rupp, who at that time had access to documents of the highest level of secrecy, reported signs that cast a dubious light on “KAL 007”. Rupp was then the principal double agent for the East German secret service, had all the trouble of sending information to convince the nervous Russians of the harmlessness of Able Archer 83. Rupp points out that he could inform the Russians only on actions of NATO, but not before U.S. unilateralism, as had happened at that time about Grenada.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: